« Tactics or strategy? | Main | NetHui 2011 - come along! »

Monday, 13 June 2011

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341bfa0353ef01538f277068970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The role of District Health Boards:

Comments

Hilary

Their meetings are usually open to the public (although I don't think the public takes much notice) and only go into committee when talking about staff matters or politically sensitive stuff about negotiating around budgets. DHBs have it tough a lot of the time. Not enough money, lots of demands including from ministers like the current one with very strict targets for a very small list of favoured conditions which don't include such major issues as mental health and disability support. I've been on a DSAC for a term and I was quite impressed about what I saw re good intentions generally of the board members and senior staff (admittedly it was under the exceptionally good Ken Whelan). But so many conflicting agendas to manage, so many silos, poor communication across many areas and conflicting systems even IT, so little money to stretch across primary secondary and tertiary health care. Vital to have elected board members there especially those with good links to the community. So to answer your question: yes the minister sets their budgets and targets and would probably like them to do their business in a secret and corporate and competitive way. But they are also public bodies run for and by the people of the region, and need to be brave enough to engage the public in their debates and welcome them into governance roles. This is what the 2000 Health Act envisaged after a decade of neo-lib corporatisation in the 1990s.

The comments to this entry are closed.

December 2012

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31